<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Greater Roman Britain</title>
        <link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/topic/1275/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Some
time ago on another list the idea of a stronger Roman Britain was traded about.  Since then I have from time to time
thought about the idea again.  Below is the result. 

Between the year of the 4 emperors in 69 AD and the Batavi revolt
in 70 AD a fair number of Legions had been out right destroyed and or disbanded. 

Legio I Macriana liberatrix raised by Lucius Clodius Macer a
governor in North Africa who tried to revolt against Nero in 68 AD was disbanded in 69 AD.

Legio IV Macedonica... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:07:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8207/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8207</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Problem is, the forces that tore the Roman Empire down are also strengthened. In the OTL 4th century, the Britanniae were a breeding ground for Usurpers, more
than any other area, until at last Honorius had enough and kicked Britain out of the Empire in 410. I don&#39;t see this changing. The Pictish incursions of
the 430s will be worse without the semi-civilised tribes of the North, as those tribes will have become just ordinary Romano-British. Britain was rich, but it
simply couldn&#39;t... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Vordarian)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8207</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8204/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Touche.  Of course you&#39;ve seen Alternate History that posits some POD in the ancient world and then asks &quot;Now how does this effect the Second World
War?&quot;   My main point is that Britain was not an obscure backwater with a negligible impact on the rest of the Empire.  Changes there could result in
different Emperors down the road.
<br>
<br>
As for Hibernia I think the Romans would not try to occupy the entire island.  I see their main presence in counties Waterford and Wexford... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TomB1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8204</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8201/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ While you make a lot of good points, I don&#39;t think you&#39;re addressing the impact of the POD, which posits additional military forces permanently
assigned to Britain, and the subjugation of a lot of the forces that later helped to tear down Roman Britain. While being an island doesn&#39;t make Britain
immune from invasion, it certainly helps, and I&#39;m not sure you can say that it would ever fall. The Byzantines survived way worse threats (way, way, way
worse threats) than Roman... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Abdul Hadi Pasha II)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8201</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8192/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8192</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I don&#39;t think Romanitas in Britain would survive. On the contrary, Romanisation of Ireland and the Lowlands would only ensure that it falls quicker. Before
I elaborate this, a quick aside. The Rhine is a cultural break today. French has spread eastward due to French conquests from the XVI century onward, but there
were some Romanic pockets throughout the German-speaking areas west of the Rhine, for example along the Mosel. As for the Hadrian&#39;s wall and the
&#39;natural&#39; border of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Vordarian)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8192</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:36:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8191/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8191</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title"><strong... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (miketr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8191</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:03:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8190/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8190</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ahoj!
<br>
The wild bogs of Albion were not very deeply Romanised. It is true that the most developed parts of Roman Britain - the south-east, were thoroughly Germanised,
so any Latin speaking pockets there were destroyed. Anybody know anything about Latin use in Britain c.350-400?
<br>
<br>
Still, all three parts of Roman Britain not conquered by the Saxons and Angles were Celtic speaking. And the refugees to the continent also must had been
partly/largely Celtic speaking as well.
<br>
<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (borys68)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8190</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:55:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8189/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8189</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 200 years is short term Tom? 
<br>
<br>
As to the good emperor of Britain and Northern Gaul, assuming he isn&#39;t butterflied away totally.  One would assume his treasurer Allectus puts a knife in
his back on que.   
<br>
<br>
Michael ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (miketr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8189</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8188/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8188</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You need to work out the short term consequences before you work out the long term consequences.  Britain was not unimporant in Roman history.  Let me give an
example let us assume that because Turbo Brittania is stronger that OTL Carausius has more forces to play with and so defeats Constantius Chlorus. 
Wouldn&#39;t that cause immense changes in the TL? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TomB1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8188</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/reply/8187/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html#reply-8187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I guess that depend on what happens for the next couple of centuries. How deeply does Roman civilization seep into the isles? When do they become Christian? Do
they? Is there a polity extant when Barbarians invade that is strong enough to beat them back? I tend to think it unlikely that Germanic invasions can be
completely kept out, but maybe they could be prevented from becoming overwhelming, and like the Norman invasions of France, able to assimilate newcomers. That
could leave you with a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Abdul Hadi Pasha II)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/sreply/8187</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:56:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Greater Roman Britain ]]></title>
			<link>http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/topic/1275/t/Greater-Roman-Britain.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-FAMILY: &amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;serif&amp;#39;">Some
time ago on another list the idea of a stronger Roman Britain was traded about.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> Since then I have from time to time
thought about the idea again.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> Below is the result.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (miketr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://alternatehistoryfictory.yuku.com/topic/1275</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>